The removal of the coach does not count: the setup on the terms and the operator who went on vacatio
I'll share: I bet that there will be a deletion in the match. The player was removed, but the bet did not play, as it turns out that the red card does not count to the coach. Although there was just a "deletion" in the line, without clarification. The court supported the bookmaker. This is a setup based on terms. There was also a situation where I couldn't withdraw money because the verification system was on "address verification," and I had already sent three different documents. It turned out that the operator had gone on vacation, and no one had seen my ticket. A kindergarten-level business process. Which bookmaker should I choose, where the terminology in the line is unambiguous, and the workflow of technical support does not depend on one person?
Re: The removal of the coach does not count: the setup on the terms and the operator who went on vac
A loss due to the ambiguity of the term "removal" (the coach was not counted) is a setup for interpretation. Ticket suspension due to the operator going on vacation is a lack of business processes. Terminology and workflow should be ironclad. I appreciate the accuracy of words and deeds on the Melbet casino website. The line is clearly deciphered there, and my message will not hang in the air because a particular manager has left for coffee.